<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Smoking Politics</title>
      <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/</link>
      <description>How the right wing is stealing elections, destroying our country and laughing all the way to the bank. </description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:01:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Double Bubble. Double Trouble.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Last August, <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/08/the_housing_mar.htm">we wrote about the double bubble in the housing market</a>: a more traditional bubble, then over-inflated by a massive asset bubble that drove prices up and up and up. The bigger the bubble, the bigger the pop.

In that post we wrote,<blockquote>In every modern recession, the fall in housing prices <em>follows</em> the economy slowing down. <strong>What we have yet to see is the falling economy's effect on housing prices.</strong> So if you think prices have already dropped, and might even be reaching a bottom, we think it's the other way around: <em>prices are about to <strong>start</strong> dropping</em>. </blockquote>And so here we are.  Yesterday's news of a mind-boggling 50,000+ jobs lost in a single day brings us now to the start of this second bubble popping.  Because for all of economic talk about housing markets and prices and fancy new mortgages that were created, at its economic base, housing prices are just about the simplest thing in the world.  

When people make more money, or more people move into a market, housing prices slowly go up. When people make less money, or people move out of a market, housing prices slowly go down.  

The housing bubble popped, leading to recession, and the recession is now going to lead to a further decline in housing prices.  Where will that lead?

The problem at the root of the housing asset bubble is that over the last few decades -- since Reagan and the Republican free-market supply-side, trickle-down policies took over -- Americans have not been <em>earning</em> more, they've just been able to <em>buy</em> more thanks to a litany of mortgage and other debt-raising products that compensate for the lack of earnings.

People used to be required to put 20% down before they could buy a house.  How many people do you know, honestly, that have 20% to put down on a house now? How many do you know that actually have 20% equity accrued in the house they already own? We're betting not many.

That 20% down payment requirement kept housing prices in check. But that became a 15% requirement, then 10%, then 5% then a negative 10% requirement, where you could actually get a mortgage for 110% of the value of your house.  Well, they helped inflate the bubble.

On top of that, loan standards used to require that people spend no more than 25-28% of their income on housing expenses. This also kept prices in check.   This was also set aside, and "liar loans" further inflated the bubble.   Now that all has to be undone.

Last August, real estate experts were claiming that 2009 was to be the bottom of the market, and housing prices were going to head back up. Just like they claimed that 2008 was going to be the bottom and that 2007 was when the market would turn.

Sadly, the chances of real estate prices turning back up, in real dollar terms, has vanished for the next decade at least. There are two coherent facts behind this.

First, the size of the bubble means that someone who bought a house for $500,000 in 2005 is already 20-25% down in the price of the house. Factor in inflation, and it's closer to 35 - 40% down right now, four years later.  Of the millions of Americans who will lose their jobs this year, many will be unable to cover their mortgages.  And foreclosures, short sales, sales right before the short sales, these will continue to increase, driving prices down even further.  This all means there is little <em>demand</em> for high-priced houses.

Second, the bubble caused a building boom, and along with all the foreclosures there is now a huge <em>supply</em> of houses and condos waiting to be sold.  And only then will the "shadow" market of people waiting on the sidelines for a better market in which to sell their houses kick in.  

Only after all of these factors are cleared will market conditions even start to return to normal.

By 2010, perhaps 2011, perhaps we will see signs of a bottom of the real estate market, with prices having returned to their historical norms at a level that many suggest is 30-35% below where they are today.

For many, this will be personal financially troubling, even disastrous.  From an economic point of view, it is the fundamental principal of supply, demand, and income proving to be true again, and a return to economic reality.

What can be done about it?  The root cause of this and many other problems in our economy is the stagnation of incomes that began when Reagan was elected.  Republican policies brought a massive concentration of wealth at the top with a select few reaping all of the benefits of our economic system.  But this double-bubble collapsing-economy problem is costing <em>their</em> wealth as well.  Trickle-down doesn't, and when the rest of us are tapped out by misguided policies like these it spells disaster for everyone.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2009/01/double_bubble_double_trouble.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2009/01/double_bubble_double_trouble.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Economy</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">economy</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">housing</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:01:57 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Millions Of Dollars Versus Millions of Voters</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In a democracy, every person has a single vote. Unfortunately, what is becoming increasingly true is that someone with millions of dollars and the willingness to fund front groups has the ability to influence millions of votes. 

Take the issue of the Iraq War - by any and every national poll, millions of Americans want the war to stop as they see through the lies that got us in the war, the lies that have kept us in the war and now with even the Iraqi leadership asking we leave, the vast majority of Americans see no reason to fund billions on dollars in war every month.

However, despite their wishes and their votes, the wishes of the people are countered by the wishes of the few, or in today's example, the wishes of one, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson is one of the very few wealthy "behind-the-scenes" manipulators that set up phony front groups and fund them with millions and millions of dollars to pollute our country's discourse, smear people, spread fear and lies and the worst kinds of dirty stories.  Every politician knows that this ugliness could be directed at them if they dare try to fight this kind of power.

Where do these Republican, pro-war front groups get so <em>much</em> money?

Thomas B. Edsell's July 25 post at Huffington Post, titled <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/25/sheldon-adelson-gops-answ_n_114899.html">Sheldon Adelson: GOP's Answer To George Soros?</a> provides us with a few clues.<blockquote>Sheldon Adelson, the 74-year-old casino billionaire who has become the third richest man in America and who has strong ties to the hard-line Likud Party in Israel, has emerged this year a major benefactor of the American right.</blockquote>Adelson has been a major backer of right-wing Republicans, including Tom DeLay, and has given $2.9 million to a Newt Gingrich organization, American Solutions for Winning the Future.

And now, according to Edsell, <blockquote>. . .Adelson, according to the National Journal, has begun channeling cash and fundraising support to Vets for Freedom, which is expected to use the influx of money to finance what it claims will be a multimillion dollar "Four Months For Victory" ad campaign.</blockquote>

Why does a wealthy Jewish casino owner, so rich that he is flown around in his own Boeing 767,  support a veteran's organization?  Probably because Vets For Freedom isn't really a veteran's organization, but a Republican Party front group working to elect John McCain and keep the Iraq war going.

If Vets For Freedom was a veteran's organization, they would be front and center in holding John McCain responsible for voting against the new G.I. Bill? But they didn't say a word.

If Vets For Freedom was a veteran's organization, they would be concerned with the hundreds of thousands of returning wounded warriors and their need for care and assistance? But they're not.

In fact, Vets For Freedom has only one mission - build public support for continuing the war in Iraq and now it appears they really only have one donor - a hard line neoconservative who is determined to influence US foreign policy in the Middle East.  

Adelson is also a major funder of Freedom's Watch, another Republican front group that exists solely to help wealthy individuals like Adelson get around campaign finance laws that are designed to protect our democracy from this kind of dollars-outweigh-votes corrupting influence.  

These organizations are allowed to take unlimited donations and not disclose donors because they are supposed to be educating the public about issues, not polluting our elections with ads that support or smear candidates.  But, of course, who in the Bush government is going to stop them from breaking our campaign finance laws to support Republicans and smear Democrats?

In Israel Adelson has purchased a newspaper that he uses to try to influence Israeli politics.  According to some, he inspires resentment and fear there. A recent <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/06/30/080630fa_fact_bruck?currentPage=all">New Yorker article</a> about Adelson says, 
<blockquote>"In Israel, where political, academic and business leaders tend to be outspoken, there is a striking reticence at the mention of Sheldon Adelson. Even people who are diametrically opposed to his politics refuse to be interviewed. 'There is a discernible amount of self-censorship going on,' the liberal Israeli-American writer Bernard Avishai said. 'There is no ideological justification for what Sheldon is doing among the Israeli intelligentsia and a revulsion at an American weighing in so heavily on Israeli politics, in such a crude, reactionary way. But they won't speak.'"  </blockquote>

<em>Post-Script: As we were about to publish it, news comes that Sheldon Adelson has hired Karl Rove with a mid six figure deal to help run <a href="http://www.freedomswatch.newsladder.net">"Freedom's Watch" </a>another right wing front group.</em>


]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/millions_of_dollars_versus_mil.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/millions_of_dollars_versus_mil.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:41:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vets For Freedom NewsLadder Is Up: It&apos;s Fair and Balanced (Really)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[We'd like to introduce the <a href="http://vetsforfreedom.newsladder.net/">Vets for Freedom NewsLadder</a>. Like all the <a href="http://www.newsladder.net">NewsLadders</a> that are up and running, this is a great place to find out all about an issue on one site with articles, blog posts, and videos linked up and voted up or down by readers like you.

At the <a href="http://www.vetsforfreedom.newsladder.net">Vets for Freedom NewsLadder</a> we are linking to all of the stories and articles about this group and together we can ask, and potentially answer some very basic questions.

For example, there are lots and lots of stories about VFF supporting John McCain and wanting to stay the course in Iraq and keep our troops there literally forever, but how come there aren't any stories about VFF wanting John McCain to support the recent GI Bill? 

Wouldn't a real veterans group be interested in that? Hmm.

Now, there are plenty of stories about VFF endorsing pro-war candidates but none about VFF endorsing Iraq vets who are running like Jon Powers in New York? 

Wouldn't a real veterans group want to support veterans running for office? How odd.

And then what about Afghanistan -- where virtually every military group and veterans group agree, we should be doing more there.

Here are all of the articles about Vets For Freedom and what they think about Afghanistan.
<blockquote>
(this space left intentionally blank because there aren't any)</blockquote>

Yes, a complete listing right there 

We have recently written a few posts about Vets for Freedom.  In our post, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson-and-james-boyce/vets-for-freedom-says-tho_b_112784.html">"Vets for Freedom Says Thousands Of Donors -- We Count Five"</a>, we asked how a group that had only five donors and $2050 in contributions in the most recent reporting period could say their 501c4 arm had "thousand" of donors and donations of over $1.5 million.

In our post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson-and-james-boyce/25000-members-but-only-5_b_113320.html">"25,000 Members" But Only 5 Donors? Is This The New Math?"</a>  we noted the low traffic at their website and again asked about their claim to have "thousands" of donors.  We urged the media not to fall for their "thousands of donors" line.

Soon we are going to write more about this "veterans" group.  We have been looking into where this "veterans" organization stands on veterans issues. Early indications from the NewsLadder indicate that well, they don't.

We encourage everyone -- from the left and the right -- to join this effort and go sign up at the <a href="http://vetsforfreedom.newsladder.net/ ">Vets For Freedom NewsLadder</a>.  This way people can see the stories and decide for themselves about the group.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/vets_for_freedom_newsladder_is.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/vets_for_freedom_newsladder_is.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:40:38 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>&quot;25,000 Members&quot; But Only 5 Donors? Is This The New Math?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, we wrote about <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson-and-james-boyce/vets-for-freedom-says-tho_b_112784.html">the Republican group, Vets For Freedom, and their ability to run $1.5 million dollars in TV advertising with seemingly no support.</a>

In our blog post, we noted that the founder of the group was claiming thousands of donors.   And the group claims to have 25,000 members.  A number which if true might give a hint of credibility to their claims. However, when it is becoming increasingly clear that <a href="http://www.vetsforobama.org">more and more real veterans are coming out in support of Barack Obama</a>, is it possible that VFF actually has 25,000 members?

Well, we're not from Missouri but frankly, we'd have to see the membership roster to even believe that they have 2,500 members, why?

First, in their last report, they have exactly 5 donors listed. One, two, three, four, five. So unless their marketing efforts are truly horrific, to the tune of a .00000005 response rate, we have to believe that their member list is slightly inflated.

Second, if you look at their web site traffic on public sites, you'll see that the traffic is very very light; with some recent days in May hovering around zero, wouldn't a 25,000 member person organization have more than a couple of thousand total visits a month?

Unfortunately, many news organizations are taking the 25,000 numbers as a fact versus a 'claim' -- if we claimed that a million people read everything we wrote, it wouldn't make it true -- but who knows maybe people would start writing that -- just like we are seeing these.

There's an old expression, a lie can get halfway around the world before the truth gets its shoes on, and today from the <em>Guardian</em> in London, we have proof.

<blockquote>The £750,000 campaign launched by the 25,000-member Vets for Freedom implicitly criticises the Republican senator's anti-war Democrat rival Barack Obama, who has stated he wants to withdraw combat forces within 16 months of taking office.</blockquote>

On the other hand, if Vets For Freedom really does have 25,000 veteran members, we'll post the whole membership list right here, just send us the names guys, we'll put everyone up.

After all, we can easily fit in five names right here.
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/25000_members_but_only_5_donor.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/25000_members_but_only_5_donor.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:38:55 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vets for Freedom Says Thousands Of Donors -- We Count Five</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In a recent story about Vets for Freedom's new campaign in support of Republican Presidential candidate John McCain, the Virginia-Pilot <a href="http://hamptonroads.com/2008/07/prowar-vets-freedom-ads-roll-out-hampton-roads">quoted VFFs Chairman Pete Hegseth</a> on donor disclosure.<blockquote>Vets for Freedom's efforts are being fueled by donations from thousands of people nationwide, Hegseth said. He said the group will not release donors' names nor the size of their donations. The group is registered under a section of federal tax law that allows it to advertise and organize on behalf of particular policies while maintaining the confidentiality of its donors.

Donations to political campaigns or political action committees, by contrast, generally must be reported and are limited by law.</blockquote>Thousands of donations?  We looked up Vets for Freedom's reporting records and found a total of five (5) donors and $2,050 total donations in the <a href="http://opensecrets.org/527s/527cmtedetail_contribs.php?ein=205258611&cycle=2008">most recent period</a> they reported.  This reporting is for their "527" committee, which is legally allowed to " influence the nomination, election, appointment or defeat of candidates for public office" but is not allowed to coordinate with any candidate's campaign. However, their 501c4 charity arm, the part of the group that does not have to report its donors, can not legally do any of those things.


So what's the takeaway? On one hand, we have a 527 group with a total of $2,050 in donations, not enough to pay for Mark Penn's coffee break, and on the other we have a charity that legally can not be involved in direct political action? What's happening?

Well if you have "thousands" of mystery donors unreported but supporting John McCain's campaign and suddenly, a small fringe front group with just 5 real donors has over $1.5 million dollars to run a television campaign and there are plans for a major push this fall. 

We're betting this is nothing more than a conduit for one or two very large donations intended to get around election law to the benefit of candidate McCain.

The <em>Washington Post</em>'s blog <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/07/06/veterans_group_urges_support_t.html">The Trail</a> tried to pin Hegseth down on why this "non-election" group is advertising with McCain's message in swing states important to McCain, and only just before an election with McCain as a candidate.  

From the story, <blockquote>Hegseth said his group is not operating on behalf of McCain and notes that federal law prohibits the organization from coordinating the ad with the campaign. The states were chosen, he said, not because they are crucial swing states for McCain, but because the heightened interest in the election in those states will give it a larger audience.
</blockquote>

What Hegseth didn't mention is that VFF's ads were bought immediately after the McCain Campaign stopped advertising.

What Hegseth didn't mention is that VFF is supporting candidates across the country, but surprise, none of the Iraq War or Vietnam veterans who are running like Jon Powers or Charlie Brown.

What Hegseth didn't mention is that there are <a href="http://www.vetsforobama.org">real veterans groups</a> with <a href="http://vetsforobama.org/sign-the-petition/">real veterans signing real petitions</a> and supporting a candidate, only those real veterans, are supporting <a href="http://www.vetsforobama.org">Barack Obama.</a>

The only thing Hegseth could do was concede that the message in the ad is almost identical to McCain's on the stump -- the surge worked; let's continue the war until we win. He said McCain has been the "strongest advocate" for the veterans of the two wars.

Which is about as believable as McCain's claim that <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/07/08/mccain-veterans-award-redux/">real veterans groups support him.</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/vets_for_freedom_says_thousand.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/07/vets_for_freedom_says_thousand.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:38:40 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Watching Freedom&apos;s Watch: The Donors</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Since 2004, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson-and-james-boyce">we have</a> been very involved in investigating, exposing, and uncovering the roots and exposing the tactics and lies of the right-wing smear machine. James was involved not only in John Kerry's campaign, but also in the Truth and Trust Team, a group of Kerry friends and family who attempted to fight back against the <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/07/the_swiftboater.htm">Swift Boat Veterans</a>.

Dave, of course, <a href="http://seeingtheforest.com/">followed</a> the campaign and those attacks closely, and then worked with James and others, including our friend, <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/">Taylor Marsh</a>, on The Patriot Project in 2006. Created by John Kerry, David Thorne and others, The Patriot Project helped veterans such as Joe Sestak, Patrick Murphy and John Murtha defend themselves -- even looking into previous <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/09/john_mccain_200.htm">attacks on John McCain</a>.  We also were part of the team that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/new-frontgroup-alert-ec_b_29545.html">exposed</a> the Economic Freedom Fund, a group created with a $5,000,000 donation from <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=24519">Bob Perry</a> that attacked moderate Democrats, primarily in red states.

Why do folks like Bob Perry give money like that? It's strictly business.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/02/watching_freedoms_watch_the_do.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/02/watching_freedoms_watch_the_do.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Freedoms Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">front groups</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">smears</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:52:51 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>If You Are In LA Area</title>
         <description><![CDATA[James Boyce will be a guest on the <a href="http://www.gotomario.com">Mario Solich Show</a>, Los Angeles AM 1150, 4:20 pm Pacific time talking about the <a href="http://california.newsladder.net/">California Newsladder</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/01/if_you_are_in_la_area.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/01/if_you_are_in_la_area.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Newsladder</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">California Newsladder</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Newsladder</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Boy Who Cried Terror</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<strong>Message to Congress: No one believes Bush and this is dangerous to the country!</strong>

There is an urgent warning today from the FBI, that Al-Qaeda might attack shopping malls over the holiday season.  See <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/11/exclusive-fbi-a.html">Exclusive: FBI: Al Qaeda May Strike U.S. Shopping Malls in LA, Chicago</a>,<blockquote>The FBI is warning that al Qaeda may be preparing a series of holiday attacks on U.S. shopping malls in Los Angeles and Chicago, according to an intelligence bulletin distributed to law enforcement authorities across the country this morning.</blockquote>Is there a single person in this country who doesn't wonder if this is another Bush trick?  Be honest, it crossed your mind, didn't it?

<strong>But what if it's true?</strong>

Meanwhile, hardly a day goes by without another dramatic statement from Bush or Cheney claiming that Iran poses a grave threat to the world.  But few bother to listen anymore.  People just roll their eyes.  Bush cried wolf over Iraq.  Bush raised the terror threat level and announced arrests or warnings for political purposes.  Bush pumped fear into the country to win elections.  

And now another warning.

<strong><a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/01/if_iran_really_1.htm">But what if it's true?</a></strong> 

Listen up, people!  The FBI is warning about an al Queda attack on shopping malls this Christmas and almost no one will pay attention because no one believes this government anymore.  Everyone has seen them manipulate terror threats, pump the fear for elections -- or just to get another capital gains tax cut passed. 

Bush has lost credibility, but the world remains dangerous.  Congress must act!  Congress must remove Bush and Cheney for lying to the country to start a war.  Congress must restore the public's trust in our country's leadership.  The current situation is <em><strong>dangerous</strong></em>. If the government says we are about to be attacked <em>we need to be able to believe them</em> and act on it, instead of rolling our eyes and wondering how these clowns think they can get away with more of this fear-pumping.  <em>Because there just might BE a time when we ARE about to be attacked.</em>

One more time: Congress, stop posturing.  Stop worrying about the political fallout.  <em>Start doing what is right for the country.</em>  Bush and Cheney have to be removed from office because they lied to us to get us to support war in Iraq, and now no one believes the government, and this is <em>dangerous</em>. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/11/the_boy_who_cried_terror.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/11/the_boy_who_cried_terror.html</guid>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">al Qaeda</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Bush</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cheney</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">impeachment</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:49:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Republican &quot;NASCAR&quot; Smear On Democrats</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Republicans are circulating a new smear, saying that Democratic Congressional staffers advised aides to get vaccinations before visiting NASCAR events.  It is, of course, just a lie designed to drive the "elite limousine liberal" and "Democrats hate regular people" narratives.

In fact the aides were visiting "health care centers, detention facilities and other operations where they could be exposed to communicable diseases" and the immunizations are routine.

The Drudge Report has been headlining the smear for a several days.  Of course Republican talk-radio has been running with it.   Here are just a few examples of the spread of the smear:

FOX:<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nascar/story/7323312"> Aides immunized before NASCAR race</a>,<blockquote>Going to a NASCAR race? Better get your shots.

That's the message Rep. Robin Hayes seems to think is being sent as a handful of congressional aides were told to get immunized before a fact-finding trip for a House Homeland Security Committee.

The group was immunized for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria and influenza before attending last weekend's NASCAR race in Talladega and this weekend's race in Concord, N.C.</blockquote>
Atlanta: <a title="GOP outraged over NASCAR-immunizations advisory | ajc.com" href="http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/10/11/NASCARIMMUNIZE_1011.html">GOP outraged over NASCAR-immunizations advisory</a>


And days after the lie was refuted, the lie continues to spread: 

Atlanta TV: <a href="http://www.wsbtv.com/news/14332863/detail.html">Congressman Insults NASCAR Fans</a>

Indianapolis: <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/SPORTS0109/710130465/1052/SPORTS01">NASCAR races danger to government workers?</a>

One way the Republican machine spreads this stuff is posting to forums.  And <a href="http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/10/10/democrats-require-immunization-before-pandering-to-rednecks/">here is an example</a> of a "regular person" posting a comment in a sports forum:<blockquote>It is offensive that the Democrats choose to be vaccinated from Nascar fans. I thought they claimed to be inclusive of everyone and they blame Republicans for having stereotypes. If they went to a football, baseball, or basketball game would they have been vaccinated? NO. It's when they go to a Nascar event that they are vaccinated. Obviously they consider Nascar fans to be a group of rednecks, southerners and Christians that are apparently disease ridden.</blockquote>
<a href="http://forums.sportingnews.com/viewtopic.php?t=289100&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=&sid=e89f70cfbf9be68384f1934f6b4986c9">Here is another</a> sports forum example.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/new_republican_nascar_smear_on.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/new_republican_nascar_smear_on.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Smears</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">immunizations</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NASCAR</category>
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 07:10:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Al Gore  WILL Be Smeared</title>
         <description><![CDATA[If Al Gore Is awarded the Nobel Prize he WILL be smeared.  There is no question about it.

On May 15, 2007, we wrote a post titled, <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/05/we_guarantee_al.htm">We Guarantee Al Gore Will Be Attacked Next Week, We Absolutely Guarantee It</a>.  We wrote,<blockquote>On Monday, Al Gore has a new book coming out next week, titled, <em>The Assault On Reason</em>. 

Because he is standing up, telling the truth and because he simply is a Democrat and progressive leader, Al Gore will be smeared mercilessly by the right-wing smear machine. He will be ridiculed, made fun of and mocked. They will tease and make fun of him. 

They will rush to say that he is bitter about 2000, crazy, insane, pontificating and out of touch.

They will bring up his utility bills and the boards he is a member of.

They will talk about his kiss with Tipper, her crusade against vulgar rap lyrics. 

They will bring up his weight and the beard. And say it's all about 2008.</blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/al_gore_will_be_smeared.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/al_gore_will_be_smeared.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Smears</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Al Gore</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">climate change</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">global warming</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nobel Prize</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">smears</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:25:06 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hillary Clinton: Mission Accomplished.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[On January 22, 2007, as Senator Clinton went viral with her announcement that she was, essentially, running for The White House, we noted that her first challenge was to <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/01/hillarys_primar.htm">shatter the prism of the right.</a>  We wrote, <blockquote>[T]his simply is a fact of modern politics in America. For the past three decades, the right wing has employed a powerful strategy of "$ell and $mear." They insist on being the gatekeepers to public opinion and have developed a powerful machine that tells us who to like - and who to hate.

... They $mear Democratic and Progressive heroes, reducing American success stories such as George McGovern, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis into humiliated historical footnotes. They destroy our leaders. They destroy those that might become our leaders. There is no Democratic or Progressive leader of any note of the last twenty years that has not been attacked.</blockquote>
Essentially, what we meant was:]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/hillary_clinton_mission_accomp.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/hillary_clinton_mission_accomp.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Candidates</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">2008</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Democrats</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hillary Clinton</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">swiftboating</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Chinese-Americans Give Money To Clinton. The Horror. The Horror.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[If it kind of worked once, keep trying it again and again. So once again, the Right is reviving the tired 90s Asian-donations smear on the Clintons. 

Headlined at the Drudge Report, the Wall Street Journal has <a title="Big Source of Clinton's Cash Is an Unlikely Address - WSJ.com" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118826947048110677.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">Big Source of Clinton's Cash Is an Unlikely Address</a>,<blockquote>It isn't obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. ...</blockquote>Did you ask them?  Is it your business?  Actually they did ask them:

<blockquote>But he added: "I have been fortunate in my investments and all of my contributions have been my money."</blockquote>But they have a Chinese name, so let's do a big story on it.<blockquote>The Paws' political donations closely track donations made by Norman Hsu, a wealthy New York businessman in the apparel industry who once listed the Paw home as his address, according to public records. Mr. Hsu is one of the top fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.</blockquote>And now we get to the root of the big scandal - (queue horror-movie music) Someone is CHINESE-American!]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/chineseamericans_give_money_to.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/chineseamericans_give_money_to.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Candidates</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Smears</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hillary Clinton</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hsu</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Paw</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 08:21:31 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Behind The Front: The Pro-War &quot;Freedom&apos;s Watch&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[In the early 1970s, the Nixon Administration took a page out of the <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/07/oped_or_oplie.htm">tobacco industry's playbook</a> and actively organized front groups to counter the anti-war efforts of Vietnam veterans like John Kerry and Bobby Muller.  Men like John O'Neill - later to re-appear as one of the Swift Boat Veterans - were hired to create what Watergate felon Charles Colson called "counter-foils."

Today with the <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/channel-08/2007/08/ad_wars_heat_up_ahead_of_surge.html?hpid=topnews">launch of "Freedoms Watch</a>" our politics are further poisoned by the appearance of another mutant variation of this front-group tactic.  Freedoms Watch is a shadowy <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_U.S._tax_code_and_non_profits">501c4</a> organization created to try to keep Republicans from abandoning the White House on Iraq. Ironically, on the very day the President invoked the legacy of Vietnam, his administration has created this Nixonian front-group counter-foil.

]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/behind_the_front_the_prowar_fr.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/behind_the_front_the_prowar_fr.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Freedoms Watch</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">front groups</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The Global Warming Denying Machine Story Goes Mainstream.</title>
         <description><![CDATA[We just wanted to thank and congratulate both <em>Newsweek</em> and Sharon Begley, the author of a great new cover story about the funding of the Global Warming Deniers.

This story,<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20122975/site/newsweek/"> read it here,</a> is a major step forward in exposing this machine and in furthering the understanding we all need to have in how the right uses strategies first developed by the tobacco industry to promote its agenda.





]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/the_global_warming_denying_mac.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/the_global_warming_denying_mac.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Front Groups</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:01:39 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pat Tillman: Anti-War Leftist Worm Dirt</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Pat Tillman was a noted professional football player with a salary over $500,000 a year and a brilliant future ahead of him in the National Football League.  The exact opposite of a "<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chickenhawk">Chickenhawk</a>," and after 9/11, Pat Tillman dropped everything, turned down a 3-year, $3.6 million contract and enlisted in the US Army to help his country.

Two years later he died in Afghanistan.  The Pentagon told Tillman's family that he was a hero who had been killed by enemy fire.    At first, Tillman's death was a useful propaganda tool for the right and a tool to encourage patriotism for the war.  
]]></description>
         <link>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/pat_tillman_antiwar_leftist_wo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/pat_tillman_antiwar_leftist_wo.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Smears</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Pat Tillman</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:59:20 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
