<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Smoking Politics</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2008://2</id>
   <updated>2008-02-12T23:54:34Z</updated>
   <subtitle>How the right wing is stealing elections, destroying our country, laughing all the way to the bank and why 2008 will be the dirtiest election yet. </subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Watching Freedom&apos;s Watch: The Donors</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/02/watching_freedoms_watch_the_do.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2008://2.77</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-12T23:52:51Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-12T23:54:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Since 2004, we have been very involved in investigating, exposing, and uncovering the roots and exposing the tactics and lies of the right-wing smear machine. James was involved not only in John Kerry&apos;s campaign, but also in the Truth and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Front Groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49" label="Freedoms Watch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="51" label="front groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11" label="smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Since 2004, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson-and-james-boyce">we have</a> been very involved in investigating, exposing, and uncovering the roots and exposing the tactics and lies of the right-wing smear machine. James was involved not only in John Kerry's campaign, but also in the Truth and Trust Team, a group of Kerry friends and family who attempted to fight back against the <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/07/the_swiftboater.htm">Swift Boat Veterans</a>.

Dave, of course, <a href="http://seeingtheforest.com/">followed</a> the campaign and those attacks closely, and then worked with James and others, including our friend, <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/">Taylor Marsh</a>, on The Patriot Project in 2006. Created by John Kerry, David Thorne and others, The Patriot Project helped veterans such as Joe Sestak, Patrick Murphy and John Murtha defend themselves -- even looking into previous <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/09/john_mccain_200.htm">attacks on John McCain</a>.  We also were part of the team that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dave-johnson/new-frontgroup-alert-ec_b_29545.html">exposed</a> the Economic Freedom Fund, a group created with a $5,000,000 donation from <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=24519">Bob Perry</a> that attacked moderate Democrats, primarily in red states.

Why do folks like Bob Perry give money like that? It's strictly business.]]>
      <![CDATA[Take, for example, the global warming arena where we have shown folks how the same tactics, the same strategies, the same people sometimes who created this whole smear empire with the tobacco companies, are now <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/05/as_al_gores_book_hits_number_o_1.html">doing the same</a> with global warming.

ExxonMobil has given these groups $25 million over the years - often, incredibly, as charitable donations. This past quarter, they had $11.7 billion in <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/01/news/companies/exxon_earnings/">record</a> profits. That's a return on investment we all would envy.

Now, we are looking forward not back.

And what we see is a front group on steroids, a massive death star of right wing machinery, floating, ready and waiting.

Freedom's Watch, operating like the opposite of a grassroots-funded progressive group like MoveOn.org, was founded by major <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/us/politics/30watch.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print">donors like</a><blockquote>... Sheldon G. Adelson, the chairman and chief executive of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation, who ranks sixth on the Forbes Magazine list of the world's billionaires; Mel Sembler, a shopping center magnate based in St. Petersburg, Fla., who served as the ambassador to Italy and Australia; John M. Templeton Jr., the conservative philanthropist from Bryn Mawr, Pa.; and Anthony H. Gioia, a former ambassador to Malta who heads an investment group based in Buffalo, N.Y. All four men are long-time prolific donors who have raised money on behalf of Republican and conservative causes.</blockquote><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/22/AR2007082202555_2.html?sub=AR">as well as</a><blockquote>Richard Fox, one of the major building, development and real estate management companies in eastern Pennsylvania and southern New Jersey and a longtime GOP activist. He co-founded the Republican Jewish Coalition.

Gary Erlbaum, owner of Greentree Properties in Ardmore, Pa., who tried to rally Orthodox Jewish support for last year's failed reelection bid of conservative Christian Sen. Rick Santorum. </blockquote>
Freedom's Watch has direct connections with the Republican Party and is staffed by Republican Party operatives like Ari Fleischer, former White House Spokesperson; Bradley A. Blakeman, a former deputy assistant to George W. Bush; Kevin E. Moley, a senior adviser to Dick Cheney during the 2000 campaign.


Check out <a href="http://www.freedomswatch.org/">their site</a> and their rhetoric. It is a major right wing group and here's the scary part:  

Freedom's Watch says it plans to raise over <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/19/AR2008011902309_pf.html">$250,000,000 to play in this election</a>.   But Freedom's Watch is a 501(c)(4) organization, which means they can engage in political activity but not as their primary mission.   They are allowed to lobby on issues but not support candidates.    Yet the group appears to be primarily designed to influence elections in favor of Republican candidates

But who is going enforce the laws?  The FEC?  The Justice Department?  Perhaps Senate Democrats can issue one of their strongly-worded statements of disapproval.

So what do we do? 

We watch them -- and we start exposing them now, every day, all day.

We are going to post these articles frequently and often.

We are going to launch a Newsladder where we would appreciate everyone joining and linking up anything they see about this group.

We are going to launch in the coming days a new site, <a href="http://www.watchingfreedomswatch.com">www.watchingfreedomswatch.com</a> where, again, will write and expose this group.

The issue isn't you - and what you know.  If you are reading this you are a blog-reader and already know more than most people about how these things work.  The issue is whether we can drive narratives and how much knowledge we can give the average American about who these folks really are and what they are up to.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>If You Are In LA Area</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2008/01/if_you_are_in_la_area.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2008://2.76</id>
   
   <published>2008-01-03T17:00:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-01-03T17:01:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>James Boyce will be a guest on the Mario Solich Show, Los Angeles AM 1150, 4:20 pm Pacific time talking about the California Newsladder....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Newsladder" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="74" label="California" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="76" label="California Newsladder" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="78" label="Newsladder" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[James Boyce will be a guest on the <a href="http://www.gotomario.com">Mario Solich Show</a>, Los Angeles AM 1150, 4:20 pm Pacific time talking about the <a href="http://california.newsladder.net/">California Newsladder</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Boy Who Cried Terror</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/11/the_boy_who_cried_terror.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.75</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-08T20:49:43Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-08T20:51:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Message to Congress: No one believes Bush and this is dangerous to the country! There is an urgent warning today from the FBI, that Al-Qaeda might attack shopping malls over the holiday season. See Exclusive: FBI: Al Qaeda May Strike...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
   
   <category term="71" label="al Qaeda" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="67" label="Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="69" label="Cheney" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="72" label="impeachment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[<strong>Message to Congress: No one believes Bush and this is dangerous to the country!</strong>

There is an urgent warning today from the FBI, that Al-Qaeda might attack shopping malls over the holiday season.  See <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/11/exclusive-fbi-a.html">Exclusive: FBI: Al Qaeda May Strike U.S. Shopping Malls in LA, Chicago</a>,<blockquote>The FBI is warning that al Qaeda may be preparing a series of holiday attacks on U.S. shopping malls in Los Angeles and Chicago, according to an intelligence bulletin distributed to law enforcement authorities across the country this morning.</blockquote>Is there a single person in this country who doesn't wonder if this is another Bush trick?  Be honest, it crossed your mind, didn't it?

<strong>But what if it's true?</strong>

Meanwhile, hardly a day goes by without another dramatic statement from Bush or Cheney claiming that Iran poses a grave threat to the world.  But few bother to listen anymore.  People just roll their eyes.  Bush cried wolf over Iraq.  Bush raised the terror threat level and announced arrests or warnings for political purposes.  Bush pumped fear into the country to win elections.  

And now another warning.

<strong><a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2006/01/if_iran_really_1.htm">But what if it's true?</a></strong> 

Listen up, people!  The FBI is warning about an al Queda attack on shopping malls this Christmas and almost no one will pay attention because no one believes this government anymore.  Everyone has seen them manipulate terror threats, pump the fear for elections -- or just to get another capital gains tax cut passed. 

Bush has lost credibility, but the world remains dangerous.  Congress must act!  Congress must remove Bush and Cheney for lying to the country to start a war.  Congress must restore the public's trust in our country's leadership.  The current situation is <em><strong>dangerous</strong></em>. If the government says we are about to be attacked <em>we need to be able to believe them</em> and act on it, instead of rolling our eyes and wondering how these clowns think they can get away with more of this fear-pumping.  <em>Because there just might BE a time when we ARE about to be attacked.</em>

One more time: Congress, stop posturing.  Stop worrying about the political fallout.  <em>Start doing what is right for the country.</em>  Bush and Cheney have to be removed from office because they lied to us to get us to support war in Iraq, and now no one believes the government, and this is <em>dangerous</em>. ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>New Republican &quot;NASCAR&quot; Smear On Democrats</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/new_republican_nascar_smear_on.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.74</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-13T15:10:47Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-13T15:13:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Republicans are circulating a new smear, saying that Democratic Congressional staffers advised aides to get vaccinations before visiting NASCAR events. It is, of course, just a lie designed to drive the &quot;elite limousine liberal&quot; and &quot;Democrats hate regular people&quot; narratives....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="63" label="immunizations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="65" label="NASCAR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Republicans are circulating a new smear, saying that Democratic Congressional staffers advised aides to get vaccinations before visiting NASCAR events.  It is, of course, just a lie designed to drive the "elite limousine liberal" and "Democrats hate regular people" narratives.

In fact the aides were visiting "health care centers, detention facilities and other operations where they could be exposed to communicable diseases" and the immunizations are routine.

The Drudge Report has been headlining the smear for a several days.  Of course Republican talk-radio has been running with it.   Here are just a few examples of the spread of the smear:

FOX:<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/nascar/story/7323312"> Aides immunized before NASCAR race</a>,<blockquote>Going to a NASCAR race? Better get your shots.

That's the message Rep. Robin Hayes seems to think is being sent as a handful of congressional aides were told to get immunized before a fact-finding trip for a House Homeland Security Committee.

The group was immunized for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, diphtheria and influenza before attending last weekend's NASCAR race in Talladega and this weekend's race in Concord, N.C.</blockquote>
Atlanta: <a title="GOP outraged over NASCAR-immunizations advisory | ajc.com" href="http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/stories/2007/10/11/NASCARIMMUNIZE_1011.html">GOP outraged over NASCAR-immunizations advisory</a>


And days after the lie was refuted, the lie continues to spread: 

Atlanta TV: <a href="http://www.wsbtv.com/news/14332863/detail.html">Congressman Insults NASCAR Fans</a>

Indianapolis: <a href="http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/SPORTS0109/710130465/1052/SPORTS01">NASCAR races danger to government workers?</a>

One way the Republican machine spreads this stuff is posting to forums.  And <a href="http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/10/10/democrats-require-immunization-before-pandering-to-rednecks/">here is an example</a> of a "regular person" posting a comment in a sports forum:<blockquote>It is offensive that the Democrats choose to be vaccinated from Nascar fans. I thought they claimed to be inclusive of everyone and they blame Republicans for having stereotypes. If they went to a football, baseball, or basketball game would they have been vaccinated? NO. It's when they go to a Nascar event that they are vaccinated. Obviously they consider Nascar fans to be a group of rednecks, southerners and Christians that are apparently disease ridden.</blockquote>
<a href="http://forums.sportingnews.com/viewtopic.php?t=289100&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=&sid=e89f70cfbf9be68384f1934f6b4986c9">Here is another</a> sports forum example.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Al Gore  WILL Be Smeared</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/al_gore_will_be_smeared.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.73</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-11T18:25:06Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-11T18:27:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If Al Gore Is awarded the Nobel Prize he WILL be smeared. There is no question about it. On May 15, 2007, we wrote a post titled, We Guarantee Al Gore Will Be Attacked Next Week, We Absolutely Guarantee It....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="26" label="Al Gore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="62" label="climate change" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="37" label="global warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="60" label="Nobel Prize" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11" label="smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[If Al Gore Is awarded the Nobel Prize he WILL be smeared.  There is no question about it.

On May 15, 2007, we wrote a post titled, <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/05/we_guarantee_al.htm">We Guarantee Al Gore Will Be Attacked Next Week, We Absolutely Guarantee It</a>.  We wrote,<blockquote>On Monday, Al Gore has a new book coming out next week, titled, <em>The Assault On Reason</em>. 

Because he is standing up, telling the truth and because he simply is a Democrat and progressive leader, Al Gore will be smeared mercilessly by the right-wing smear machine. He will be ridiculed, made fun of and mocked. They will tease and make fun of him. 

They will rush to say that he is bitter about 2000, crazy, insane, pontificating and out of touch.

They will bring up his utility bills and the boards he is a member of.

They will talk about his kiss with Tipper, her crusade against vulgar rap lyrics. 

They will bring up his weight and the beard. And say it's all about 2008.</blockquote>]]>
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/05/and_away_we_go.htm"><p>And</a>, of course, <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/05/as_al_gores_boo.htm">we were right</a>. <p>

And what happened when Al Gore won an Oscar for his documentary, <i><em>An Inconvenient Truth</em></i>?  Again, <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/02/a_far_too_convenient_mear_part_1.html">smeared</a>.  And that <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/03/the_al_gore_lie_is_halfway_aro_1.html">smear continues</a> to spread.  There are currently <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=al+gore's+house&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS232US233&aq=t">519,000 web pages</a> referencing it.

Now there is a possibility that Al Gore is going to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his outstanding work warning about and fighting climate change caused by greenhouse gases released into our air.

You would think this was a good thing.  But there is a multi-million-dollar "global warming denial industry" operating.  It is funded by the big oil and coal companies.  Because they have a stranglehold on our economy - and our thinking - these are the most profitable corporations in the history of the world.  And they want to keep it that way.  So they dish out millions to front-groups to fog over the science that tells us the planet is in danger -- and to smear good people like Al Gore who want us to be more efficient in our energy use, and find alternatives to fuels that pollute.

So if Al Gore is awarded a Nobel Prize, expect the worst -- from the worst. ]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Hillary Clinton: Mission Accomplished.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/10/hillary_clinton_mission_accomp.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.72</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-03T15:25:25Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-03T15:27:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>On January 22, 2007, as Senator Clinton went viral with her announcement that she was, essentially, running for The White House, we noted that her first challenge was to shatter the prism of the right. We wrote, [T]his simply is...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Candidates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="56" label="2008" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Democrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="33" label="Hillary Clinton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14" label="swiftboating" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[On January 22, 2007, as Senator Clinton went viral with her announcement that she was, essentially, running for The White House, we noted that her first challenge was to <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/01/hillarys_primar.htm">shatter the prism of the right.</a>  We wrote, <blockquote>[T]his simply is a fact of modern politics in America. For the past three decades, the right wing has employed a powerful strategy of "$ell and $mear." They insist on being the gatekeepers to public opinion and have developed a powerful machine that tells us who to like - and who to hate.

... They $mear Democratic and Progressive heroes, reducing American success stories such as George McGovern, Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis into humiliated historical footnotes. They destroy our leaders. They destroy those that might become our leaders. There is no Democratic or Progressive leader of any note of the last twenty years that has not been attacked.</blockquote>
Essentially, what we meant was:]]>
      <![CDATA[Imagine if your worse enemies were the ones describing you and creating the world's impression of you. And imagine they did that for close to fifteen years, how would people who hadn't ever met you feel about you? Exactly.

There are far too many people who have never met Hillary who have a fully-formed impression of her, usually quite negative. Not defendably negative mind you, but more of a "I just don't like her" kind of impression.  

The prism of the right.

We wrote:<blockquote>This is Senator Clinton's primary challenge. Because since this strategy has been deployed, no one, not one single politician has been in the eye of the machine longer than Senator Clinton. For almost fifteen years, Americans have been bombarded with smears and negative commentary about her. Virtually every aspect of her life, personal and political, from her hairstyle to private decisions she made within her marriage, has been criticized.</blockquote>That's the reality that Senator Clinton, her supporters and her staff have had to deal with every single day and to their great credit, they didn't either ignore it, as John Kerry's campaign did in 2004 on many levels, nor did they whine and complain about it.

What Hillary did was what she did in New York State.

She and her staff rolled up their sleeves and went to work. One voter at a time, one appearance at a time, one county, one district, one state.  And what happened in New York State was a pretty good precursor to what is happening nationally. Today, she is at the top of the list of home state own-party favorability ratings.  Her 81% favorability rating among Democrats in New York State is right up there at the very top, tied with Ted Kennedy's rating among Democrats in Massachusetts. And Kennedy in Massachusettes is probably the golden standard for being liked by your party in your own state.

Grudgingly, we hear from senior people in other campaigns that they are impressed at how hard she works, how good her team is, how they keep working all day, every day. 

They're right. She's top in the polls and in the fundraising race not because of some unforeseeable chain of events, she's there because she understood the reality of her situation and she has outworked everyone else.

If she is our nominee, it will because of two core factors.

She didn't attempt to smash the negative perception as much as she shattered it softly and slowly - one person at a time.

She, and her team, have worked hard, and smart. 

Kudos to all of them.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Chinese-Americans Give Money To Clinton. The Horror. The Horror.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/chineseamericans_give_money_to.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.71</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-28T16:21:31Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-28T16:23:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If it kind of worked once, keep trying it again and again. So once again, the Right is reviving the tired 90s Asian-donations smear on the Clintons. Headlined at the Drudge Report, the Wall Street Journal has Big Source of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Candidates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="33" label="Hillary Clinton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="53" label="Hsu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="55" label="Paw" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[If it kind of worked once, keep trying it again and again. So once again, the Right is reviving the tired 90s Asian-donations smear on the Clintons. 

Headlined at the Drudge Report, the Wall Street Journal has <a title="Big Source of Clinton's Cash Is an Unlikely Address - WSJ.com" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118826947048110677.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news">Big Source of Clinton's Cash Is an Unlikely Address</a>,<blockquote>It isn't obvious how the Paw family is able to afford such political largess. ...</blockquote>Did you ask them?  Is it your business?  Actually they did ask them:

<blockquote>But he added: "I have been fortunate in my investments and all of my contributions have been my money."</blockquote>But they have a Chinese name, so let's do a big story on it.<blockquote>The Paws' political donations closely track donations made by Norman Hsu, a wealthy New York businessman in the apparel industry who once listed the Paw home as his address, according to public records. Mr. Hsu is one of the top fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.</blockquote>And now we get to the root of the big scandal - (queue horror-movie music) Someone is CHINESE-American!]]>
      <![CDATA[<blockquote>William and Alice Paw are of Chinese descent..</blockquote><strong>That's the whole story</strong>. There are no accusations of any wrongdoing. Just an American family with a Chinese name is raising a lot of money for Senator Clinton. 

In the 1990s the Republicans ran a smear campaign for years, accusing the Clintons of passing nuclear-weapons secrets to China in exchange for campaign donations.  There was never anything to back it up, of course, but the racial hatred aspect got them votes. It plays big in the South, we guess. 

In case people don't get it, the Right's echo chamber cranks up the noise.  No subtle implications need apply:  <a href="http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/2007/08/28/laundering-for-hillary/">Laundering for Hillary?</a><blockquote>The little green house at 41 Shelbourne Ave. in Daly City, Calif., (shown right) may spell big trouble for Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York as she pursues the presidency.</blockquote>
And there they go again.  The Republicans are gearing up for Senator Clinton's Presidential run. It won't be pretty, it won't be honest, but it wills be sadly, very predictable.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Behind The Front: The Pro-War &quot;Freedom&apos;s Watch&quot;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/behind_the_front_the_prowar_fr.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.70</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-22T23:34:04Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-22T23:44:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In the early 1970s, the Nixon Administration took a page out of the tobacco industry&apos;s playbook and actively organized front groups to counter the anti-war efforts of Vietnam veterans like John Kerry and Bobby Muller. Men like John O&apos;Neill -...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Front Groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49" label="Freedoms Watch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="51" label="front groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[In the early 1970s, the Nixon Administration took a page out of the <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/07/oped_or_oplie.htm">tobacco industry's playbook</a> and actively organized front groups to counter the anti-war efforts of Vietnam veterans like John Kerry and Bobby Muller.  Men like John O'Neill - later to re-appear as one of the Swift Boat Veterans - were hired to create what Watergate felon Charles Colson called "counter-foils."

Today with the <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/channel-08/2007/08/ad_wars_heat_up_ahead_of_surge.html?hpid=topnews">launch of "Freedoms Watch</a>" our politics are further poisoned by the appearance of another mutant variation of this front-group tactic.  Freedoms Watch is a shadowy <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=The_U.S._tax_code_and_non_profits">501c4</a> organization created to try to keep Republicans from abandoning the White House on Iraq. Ironically, on the very day the President invoked the legacy of Vietnam, his administration has created this Nixonian front-group counter-foil.

]]>
      <![CDATA[First of all, what is a Front Group? <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/front_groups/">Front Groups</a> have been used by the tobacco industry and the oil and energy companies to create the illusion of independence. "Freedoms Watch" can't just come out and call themselves "<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6868941,00.html">former White House aides and Republican fundraisers" </a>so they create a supposedly independent group and fund it heavily.  Everyone pretends it is an independent organization that sprang up from grassroots supporters of the war.

So who is behind this front group?  While there is some public disclosure of who is involved, there is none on their own web site.

On <a href="http://www.freedomwatch.org,">www.freedomwatch.org,</a> there is no listing of people involved, no names and no contact address. Not ONE SINGLE PERSON is listed as being affiliated with the group.   According to the press, "President Bush's first White House press secretary, Ari Fleischer, is the group's spokesman."

What is interesting to note about this site is how similar it is to one of the largest front groups created last cycle, <a href="http://www.economicfreedomfund.org">Economic Freedom Fund</a>. This group which was funded by five million dollars from Karl Rove confidante, Bob Perry, attacked Democrats throughout the cycle.

Life <a href="http://www.freedomswatch.org/default.aspx">Freedoms Watch</a>, their site has no name of an actual person associated with them.

Of course, this is not surprising. We also tracked back where their website is located (they made a little mistake which we caught.)

The company, <a href="http://democracydata.com/default.aspx">Democracy Data and Communications</a> is a leader in the "astroturf" industry. Their clients include primarily Republican-associated big businesses associations. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Democracy_Data_%26_Communications%2C_LLC_(DDC)">They actually built a site called www.voteforgeorgebush.com last cycle.</a>

Give them a cause, and a percentage of the $15 million, they'll build you a site and ads.

When "Freedoms Watch" releases their records, we will have a clearer vision into who is giving them money - $15,000,000 is a lot of money to raise - and how they are spending their money.

For now, we know they have a lot of money, and <a href="http://www.taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php?id=26097">they intend to spend it.</a>

And, there is one more funny thing that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/white-house-front-group-s_b_61465.html">our good friend Taylor Marsh pointed out</a>. (She also has the first tv spots in her post.)   If you call the 1-800 Number that "Freedom's Watch" offers you for contacting your representative, <em>they only actually connect you, if you agree with their policies</em>.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>The Global Warming Denying Machine Story Goes Mainstream.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/the_global_warming_denying_mac.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.69</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-08T23:01:39Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-22T23:02:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We just wanted to thank and congratulate both Newsweek and Sharon Begley, the author of a great new cover story about the funding of the Global Warming Deniers. This story, read it here, is a major step forward in exposing...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Front Groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[We just wanted to thank and congratulate both <em>Newsweek</em> and Sharon Begley, the author of a great new cover story about the funding of the Global Warming Deniers.

This story,<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20122975/site/newsweek/"> read it here,</a> is a major step forward in exposing this machine and in furthering the understanding we all need to have in how the right uses strategies first developed by the tobacco industry to promote its agenda.





]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Pat Tillman: Anti-War Leftist Worm Dirt</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/08/pat_tillman_antiwar_leftist_wo.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.68</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-02T22:59:20Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-22T23:01:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Pat Tillman was a noted professional football player with a salary over $500,000 a year and a brilliant future ahead of him in the National Football League. The exact opposite of a &quot;Chickenhawk,&quot; and after 9/11, Pat Tillman dropped everything,...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="47" label="Pat Tillman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Pat Tillman was a noted professional football player with a salary over $500,000 a year and a brilliant future ahead of him in the National Football League.  The exact opposite of a "<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Chickenhawk">Chickenhawk</a>," and after 9/11, Pat Tillman dropped everything, turned down a 3-year, $3.6 million contract and enlisted in the US Army to help his country.

Two years later he died in Afghanistan.  The Pentagon told Tillman's family that he was a hero who had been killed by enemy fire.    At first, Tillman's death was a useful propaganda tool for the right and a tool to encourage patriotism for the war.  
]]>
      <![CDATA[The left was accused of of being anti-American and demons when Tillman's death was first announced. <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13255">The Left Smears an American Hero</a>,<blockquote>With the body barely cold, the Left has begun demonizing the late Pat Tillman. Tillman is the former NFL star who turned down a $3.6 million contract to join the Army Rangers after 9/11. He was killed last month in Afghanistan after Islamist soldiers ambushed his jeep. For most Americans, such noble service would qualify Tillman as a national hero, but it has unleashed a torrent of hatred on the Left.</blockquote>But then reality started messing with the storyline the administration was using.  

It emerged that Army investigators covered up that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/03/AR2005050301502.html">he was killed</a> by "friendly fire."  Then it was revealed that in fact, there was no engagement with the enemy at all - Pat Tillman was still a hero, but his death was a tragic mistake  Then <a href="http://www.speaker.gov/blog/?p=303">AP reported</a>,<blockquote>Within hours of Pat Tillman's death, the Army went into information-lockdown mode, cutting off phone and Internet connections at a base in Afghanistan, posting guards on a wounded platoon mate, and ordering a sergeant to burn Tillman's uniform.</blockquote>It finally came out that Tillman had been against Bush's policies, and was an atheist.  

At this point, as Pat Tillman's family sought closure on his death, they and America watched something very disturbing. No longer the convenient cover boy for the war, Pat Tillman became instead a target of smears and attacks.

Just as Ann Coulter attacked Bobby Muller a Vietnam Veteran in a wheelchair with a pithy:

<strong>'People like you caused us to lose that war.' </strong>

Now it was Pat Tilmman's turn. The leader of the second <strike>cover-up</strike> investigation called Tillman "worm dirt" because he was an atheist.  Lasast week the extent of the Pentagon and Bush administration's mendacity became more and more clear - <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/27/AR2007072702139.html">evidence surfaced</a> that Tillman may have been shot at close range,<blockquote>Army medical examiners were suspicious about the close proximity of the three bullet holes in Pat Tillman's forehead and tried without success to get authorities to investigate whether his death amounted to a crime, according to documents obtained by the Associated Press.</blockquote>

As the news goes from bad to worse for administration the distraction strategy is elevated. Time and time again, we have seen this used, sadly, often with great success. 

If you don't want to talk about John Edwards plan to end Poverty, talk about his hair.

If you can't compete with Hillary on her policies, talk about her cleavage. 

It is a tactic that deprives the American people of a conversation about the real problems of our country. It is a strategy that keeps good men and women out of running; and the media is part of the problem, not part of the solution as they should be.

<a href="http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2007/07/27/perspective-on-pat-tillman/">Right-wing blog Macsmind</a>:
 
<blockquote>He wasn't so much a patriot as he was apparently an antiwar leftist who enjoyed chomping on Noam Chomsky.
... Not the first, won't be the last leftist in the ranks. Fact is so is his brother, Kevin. Shame. We used to sniff them out in basic training and help them "out".</blockquote>

Pat Tillman is a hero. The military leaders who covered up his death and at the same time, promoted his sacrifice as a propoganda tool, there the ones that should be sniffed out and helped 'out' of the service of this country.

<em>
YearlyKos NOTE: We will be hosting a "Smoking Politics" Roundtable on Saturday Morning. Join us as we would love to meet you and discuss the issues we've been bringing up in these posts.</em>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Reporting Live Earth News Or Shaping Opinion?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/07/reporting_live_earth_news_or_s.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.67</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-08T15:40:52Z</published>
   <updated>2007-07-08T15:55:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Organizers say Live Earth&apos;s internet audience may have been as many as two billion people*. But how is it reported today? Earth underwhelmed by environment pop extravaganza ,They rocked the world, but as the clean-up at nine climate change gigs...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="41" label="Fox News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="37" label="global warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="43" label="Live Earth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="45" label="Madonna" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Organizers say Live Earth's internet audience may have been as many as two billion people*.  But how is it reported today?  <a title="Earth underwhelmed by environment pop extravaganza - Yahoo! News" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070708/ts_nm/concert_dc_20;_ylt=Ale5l9PdwPqo7iuqM.Y6rPcE1vAI">Earth underwhelmed by environment pop extravaganza </a>,<blockquote>They rocked the world, but as the clean-up at nine climate change gigs around the globe begins, many wonder if the galaxy of pop stars did much to change it.

U.S. and British media were generally underwhelmed on Sunday by Live Earth, the mega-concert organized by former U.S. vice president and green campaigner Al Gore, which, though built on the model of Live Aid and Live 8, created a less positive buzz.</blockquote>Murdoch's Times of London had this ready, <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article2027517.ece">Live Earth fails to pack large-scale punch</a>, and Murdoch's Fox News was ready with this one, reminiscent of <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/02/a_far_too_conve.htm">the energy-use smear on Al Gore</a> that came out the day after he won the Oscar for <em>An Inconvenient Truth</em> (<a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2007/03/the_al_gore_lie.htm">see part 2 also</a>), <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,288295,00.html">'Green' Means Money, Not Environmentalism to Madonna</a>,<blockquote>Madonna had better clean up her business before she starts cleaning up the world.

... Madonna, who seems to be on top of all her many business endeavors, has actually invested about $2.7 million dollars in companies that are creating the destruction that Live Earth is trying to raise awareness about. She has invested in several companies named as the biggest corporate polluters in the world.

.. The companies include Alcoa, Ingersoll Rand, Weyerhaeuser, and several others associated with oil exploration, digging, and refining including British Petroleum, Schlumberger (a chief competitor of Halliburton), Devon Energy, Peabody Energy, Emerson Electric, Kimberly Clark and Weatherford International.

... one has to wonder why Madonna has put even a penny into the company if she has any feeling for environmental causes. But that's an inconvenient question for the material girl as she prepares to close the Live Earth show live from London.</blockquote>

Nice try, but people <em>do</em> understand the problem and <em>are</em> going to continue to pressure the government for action.

*P.S. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSN0724055520070707?feedType=RSS&rpc=22&sp=true">MSN reports</a> 9 million streaming, AOL reports 5 million.  AND,<blockquote>Control Room, producer of Live Earth and Live 8, said it found that the on-demand streams in the days after the Live 8 had the most impact, especially after clips were passed around by e-mail.

Live 8 was streamed by users more than 100 million times in the six weeks following the shows.

Live Earth is predicted to be three times bigger with organizers expecting more than 80 percent of the viewership will be on-demand in the days after the event.</blockquote>So two billion seems high, but one heck of a lot of people did and will tune in for sure.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Op-Ed Or Op-Lie?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/07/the_other_side_of_the_story_is_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.66</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-02T20:07:13Z</published>
   <updated>2007-07-02T21:15:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary>What could be more important than dealing with the threat of global warming? Exposing the companies and groups that continue to try and distort the issue for financial gain and holding the media accountable for their role and complicity in...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
         <category term="Front Groups" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="26" label="Al Gore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="37" label="global warming" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="39" label="Heartland Institute" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[What could be more important than dealing with the threat of global warming? Exposing the companies and groups that continue to try and distort the issue for financial gain and holding the media accountable for their role and complicity in the continuing distortion of the truth.

Let's be perfectly clear. Global warming is a scientific fact - it is not a political issue. But a few  corporations are bringing in incredibly high profit margins from the status quo.  These profits depend on Americans and people worldwide burning more and more oil instead of working to put less carbon into the air.  So they pollute the "marketplace of ideas," deceiving people by spreading the lie of doubt that global warming is a real problem.  

Just as Big Tobacco was willing to spend hundreds of millions of dollars denying for decades that cigarettes caused cancer while hundreds of thousands died from their product each year -- spreading the same lie that the science was not clear -- so too is Big Oil willing to invest heavily in the global warming deniers.  

"<a href="http://www.smokefree.net/doc-alert/messages/247128.html">Doubt is our product</a>" said the tobacco companies, and citizens continued to die.  Now doubt is the product again - and the planet continues to grow hotter. 
]]>
      <![CDATA[Global Warming Deniers are nothing more than paid political operatives who are willing to profit, greatly, by placing our future at risk. It is as simple as that.  Doubt is their product.

This past weekend, we saw a clear example of how this strategy plays out. Just as Al Gore was attacked the day after winning the Oscar for "An Inconvenient Truth," just as Al Gore was attacked when his book was released, so now has the Vice President opened himself up again to further attack with the coming LiveEarth concerts.

Last Saturday, The Drudge Report linked to <a title="Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Other Views" href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article">Alarmist global warming claims melt under scientific scrutiny :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES</a>.  This is an op-ed by James M. Taylor, a senior fellow at the Heartland Institute.  The Heartland Institute <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=heartland+institute+%22conservative+movement%22&sourceid=navclient-ff&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGGL,GGGL:2006-38,GGGL:en">is one of the</a> core organizations of the so-called "conservative movement," and the Drudge Report is one of the movement's primary communication outlets. 

The strategy of creating a false op-ed that is linked to by Drudge is a cornerstone of the right. The Chicago Sun-Times either was duped or is a party to the crime. Either way, they should be ashamed.

Let's track the Heartland Institute a bit.

<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute">SourceWatch</a> identifies the Heartland Institute as a <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute#Tobacco_Ties">tobacco lobbying front group</a>.  Just one example from that research:<blockquote>In a May 1991 document prepared for PM [<em>Phillip Morris</em>], Marden listed Heartland's "rapid response network" as a "potential spokesperson" among the "portfolio of organizations" that the company had cultivated to support its interests. </blockquote>SourceWatch traces the tobacco ties of other "conservative movement" organizations as well, writing<blockquote>The Heartland Institute was one of the contacts they [<em>Philip Morris</em>] had "leveraged," along with the Acton Institute for the Study of Religion and Liberty, the Alexis de Tocqueville Institute, Americans for Tax Reform, Capital Research Center, Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship and Political Philosophy, Consumer Alert, Mackinac Center for Public Policy, and the National Center for Policy Analysis.</blockquote>

As with so many organizations that were <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute#Tobacco_Industry_Funding">funded</a> to serve as tobacco-company fronts, this organization is now also <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Heartland_Institute#Exxon_Funding">funded by Exxon</a> to spread disinformation about global warming.

<a href="http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41">According to ExxonSecrets</a>,<blockquote>The Heartland Institute created a website in the Spring of 2007, www.globalwarmingheartland.org, which asserts there is no scientific consensus on global warming and features a list of experts and a list of like-minded think tanks, many of whom have received funding from ExxonMobil and other polluters.

[. . .] Walter F. Buchholtz, an ExxonMobil executive, serves as Heartland's Government Relations Advisor, according to Heartland's 2005 IRS Form 990, pg. 15.</blockquote>And when you scroll down <a href="http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/orgfactsheet.php?id=41">that page</a>, you will see the funding that Heartland receives from Exxon.

The author of the <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/450392,CST-EDT-REF30b.article">Drudge-linked op-ed</a>, James M Taylor, is not <em>just</em> a professional global warming denier.  ExxonSecrets writes, <blockquote>In the past, Taylor has served as a legal analyst for Defenders of Property Rights, an intern at the Cato Institute, and a member of the Federalist Society.

Taylor previously served as managing editor of CCH Incorporated's disability law publications, where he became a nationally known expert and frequent speaker on a variety of employment law topics. Prior to that he was a legal analyst for Defenders of Property Rights. While at Syracuse University College of Law, he was president of the local chapter of the Federalist Society and founder and editor-in-chief of the Federalist Voice.</blockquote>All of these are conservative movement organizations.

And the Heartland Institute is <em>also</em> not <em>just</em> a tobacco/oil front froup.  It is one of literally hundreds of "conservative movement" <em>tax-deductible</em> organizations created by the same <a href="http://commonwealinstitute.org/reports/tort/Section1.html#t2">core group</a> of wealthy funders.  <a href="http://www.mediatransparency.org/recipientgrants.php?recipientID=152">Media Transparency</a> shows extensive funding the for core funders of the conservative movement - the Bradley, Walton, Olin, Scaife and the rest.  Many, if not most of these organizations have missions statements that contain a variation of the same words.  From the Heartland Institute website's <a href="http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=10582">"About" page</a>, <blockquote>Heartland's mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. Such solutions include parental choice in education, choice and personal responsibility in health care, market-based approaches to environmental protection, privatization of public services, and deregulation in areas where property rights and markets do a better job than government bureaucracies.</blockquote>Heartland also serves as a Telecom front.  They publish the <a href="http://www.heartland.org/Publications.cfm?pblId=12">Information Technology Update</a>.  They work for insurance, manufacturing and other corporate interests to promote "tort reform," publishing the "<a href="http://www.heartland.org/Publications.cfm?pblId=7">Lawsuit Abuse Fortnightly</a>."  And they promote <a href="http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=10211">getting rid of public schools</a>.  And here is what Heartland writes about health care:<blockquote>Advocates of free-market health care believe too much reliance on government regulations and subsidies is the cause of many current problems, and that solutions can be found in returning to sound market principles.</blockquote>In other words - if you need health care you're on your own.

The Heartland Institute is nothing more than a charitable fraud. A foundation that works to distort the facts, and create doubt about issues where none should exist.

What should have happened is the Chicago Sun Times should have reported to their readers who is behind this group and what their interests are. Instead, they set forth in motion another lie that is now spreading around the world.

Our future is in peril.

Our world is in danger. And we have a responsibility to tell the truth.

And the media has the responsibility to inform the public so everyone clearly knows what is a piece of opinion and what is a pack of lies.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Dr. Allan Brandt Helps Us Put The Smoking In Politics.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/06/dr_allan_brandt_helps_us_put_t.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.65</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-26T19:26:09Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-26T19:30:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Over at Smoking Politics, we tell and re-tell and constantly point out that the right wing strategy of lie big, ignore the facts and shoot the messenger wasn&apos;t created out of thin air, it was started with great success by...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson and James Boyce</name>
      <uri>http://smokingpolitics.com</uri>
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Over at <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com">Smoking Politics</a>, we tell and re-tell and constantly point out that the right wing strategy of lie big, ignore the facts and shoot the messenger wasn't created out of thin air, it was started with great success by the tobacco companies almost a century ago.</p>
<p>The clearest current example of the attempts to muddy the water on whether cigarettes actually cause cancer, oh wait, that was the last example, now they're muddying the waters with Global Warming. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>It's the same strategy - shoot the messenger (<a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/05/we_guarantee_al_gore_will_be_a.html">Al Gore</a>, <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/05/exxonmobil_practice_made_perfe.html">Laurie David</a>, <a href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/04/laurie_and_sheryl_didnt_make_i.html">Sheryl Crow</a>.) Deny the facts. Spend tens of millions of dollars to form front groups. And hope you can delay the inevitable support for the facts and for the truth to come out.</p>
<p>As we've learned more and more about this, and the fact that Karl Rove is a former tobacco marketing consultant, we discovered a remarkable book, "The Cigarette Century." In it, Dr. Allan Brandt outlines the true horror of what the tobacco companies did, and in many places around the world, continue to do.</p>
<p>Here's a quote from The Washington Post's review of the book.</p>
<p><blockquote>I defy anyone to read the middle chapters of The Cigarette Century, the ones that detail the foundation of the Tobacco Institute and the industry's efforts to muddy scientific waters, and not come away with a burning need to drive down to North Carolina and find someone to throttle. Or Madison Avenue. Among the many villains Brandt skillfully waterboards are executives at the public relations giant Hill & Knowlton, which during the 1950s single-handedly orchestrated Big Tobacco's campaign to undermine anti-smoking advocates and scientists up to and including the surgeon general. No lie was too big to tell, no bit of pseudo-science too ridiculous to pass off as legitimate. Parents, if you have teenagers considering a career in p.r., have them read this first. I can't remember the last time I read a more scathing indictment of corporate malfeasance.</blockquote></p>
<p>On Wednesday at Noon Eastern, we will have Dr. Brandt on our <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hostpage.aspx?show_id=29888">Smoking Politics Radio Show</a>, and also hope to have Rick Perlstein call in as well.</p>
<p>If you've ever wondered how the Right figured out how to ozone Al Gore and Swift Boat John Kerry, you have to listen in and learn just how orchestrated this strategy has been, and just how successful as well.</p>

<p align="center"><a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hostpage.aspx?host_id=3960"><img src="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/images/ListenLive_180x60.gif" border="0"></a></p>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Right Circulating A LIE About Hillary and Take Back America</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/06/tba2007_hillary_clinton_take_b.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.64</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-20T17:39:17Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-20T18:28:56Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Here is a lie we should try to nip in the bud. Hillary Clinton spoke at the Take Back America conference this morning. The Corner on National Review Online is circulating the following lie about the event:When she declared, &quot;The...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Dave Johnson</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="33" label="Hillary Clinton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="35" label="Take Back America" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="31" label="tba2007" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Here is a lie we should try to nip in the bud.

Hillary Clinton spoke at the Take Back America conference this morning.  <a title="The Corner on National Review Online" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWEyOTFhNzc3ZDA3ZmYzNDBiZjJhNWE4ZDliZGFhMGY=">The Corner on National Review Online</a> is circulating the following lie about the event:<blockquote><strong>When she declared, "The American military has done its job," boos began to be heard around the room.</strong>  As the boos increased, Sen. Clinton raised her voice. "The American military has succeeded," she said, to more boos.  "It is the Iraqi government that has failed to make the tough decisions."  Still more boos. [emphasis added]</blockquote>I was there.  I heard what happened.  NO ONE in the crowd booed her for saying "The American military has succeeded."  That is simply a lie by a professional propagandist.

Here is a lie we should try to nip in the bud.

Hillary Clinton spoke at the Take Back America conference this morning.  <a title="The Corner on National Review Online" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YWEyOTFhNzc3ZDA3ZmYzNDBiZjJhNWE4ZDliZGFhMGY=">The Corner on National Review Online</a> is circulating the following lie about the event:<blockquote><strong>When she declared, "The American military has done its job," boos began to be heard around the room.</strong>  As the boos increased, Sen. Clinton raised her voice. "The American military has succeeded," she said, to more boos.  "It is the Iraqi government that has failed to make the tough decisions."  Still more boos. [emphasis added]</blockquote>I was there.  I heard what happened.  NO ONE in the crowd booed her for saying "The American military has succeeded."  That is simply a lie by a professional propagandist.

<a href="http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/what_boos_were_about">Bill Scher has more</a>, with video to prove it.

<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/taylor-marsh/tba-byron-york-plays-mic_b_53000.html">Taylor Marsh has more at Huffington Post</a>.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Brent Bozell&apos;s Phantom Army</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/2007/06/brent_bozells_phantom_army_1.html" />
   <id>tag:www.smokingpolitics.com,2007://2.63</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-19T18:53:41Z</published>
   <updated>2007-06-19T19:10:57Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Let every soldier hew him down a bough And bear&apos;t before him: thereby shall we shadow The numbers of our host and make discovery Err in report of us. Macbeth: Act V, Scene IV During Emperor Justinian I&apos;s war against...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Seth Oldmixon</name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="Smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smokingpolitics.com/">
      <![CDATA[Let every soldier hew him down a bough
And bear't before him: thereby shall we shadow
The numbers of our host and make discovery
Err in report of us.

<i>Macbeth: Act V, Scene IV</i>

During Emperor Justinian I's war against the Goths, the Roman general Martinus conceived a strategy to burn as many campfires as possible so as to deceive the enemy about the size of his army. The plan worked, and the Goths fled. In the United States, Nixon invented the fictional "silent majority" of American conservatives to intimidate the progressives of his day, but Brent Bozell has probably done more than anyone to keep the campfires lit.]]>
      <![CDATA[Best known for his work with the Media Research Center, a right-wing PR firm masquerading as a media watchdog, Bozell has spent the past 20 years working to propagate the myth of a "liberal media bias," a claim roundly debunked in investigative reporter Eric Alterman's 2003 book, <i>What Liberal Media?</i> Not one to surrender easily, the year after Alterman's book was published, Bozell's Media Research Center engaged in a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10775-2004Jun27.html">multi-million dollar advertising campaign</a> to keep the "liberal media" myth alive.

Apparently oblivious to irony, earlier this year Bozell's Media Research Center presented Rush Limbaugh with a "William F. Buckley, Jr. Award for Media Excellence." Bozell's most recent complaint has been that CNN hosted two Democratic debates and only one Republican debate earlier this month. This, to Bozell, amounts to "double time for Democrats," despite the fact that CNN features a daily primetime show hosted by conservative talk radio host Glenn Beck.

Another of Bozell's campfires is the Parents Television Council, a group that purports to represent "Americas demand for positive, family-oriented television programming." In 2004, then FCC Chair Michael Powell startled U.S. Senators by reporting that indecency complaints were soaring. According to Mediaweek reporter Todd Shields, however, Powell didn't tell anyone that FCC analysis found that <a href="http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/2004/indecency_mediaweek.htm">over 99 percent of complaints came from Bozell's Parents Television Council</a>.

Last June, Shields reported that <a href="http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002652454">Bozell's Parents Television Council is still manufacturing illusory outrage</a>. Following a record FCC indecency fine, it was discovered that "There were no true complainants from actual viewers." In fact, every complaint had come from Bozell's group. Once again, many campfires, few actual troops.

But that's not all. Bozell also founded the Conservative Communications Center, a conservative messaging organization which produces the conservative web site, Cybercast News Service, famous for reporting that Saddam Hussein had both weapons of mass destruction and ties to al Qaeda. Bozell is also Executive Director of the Conservative Victory Committee PAC, and is a member of the Council for National Policy. In the past he has been National Finance Chairman for Pat Buchanan's failed 1992 presidential bid and President of the National Conservative Political Action Committee.

Last fall, at a conservative forum in DC, I overheard a panelist say, "sometimes, if you don't have a crisis, you have to generate one." This was a major facet of the conservative rise to power over the last 20 years - generating phony crises and creating an impression that the public has shifted far to the right in matters both social and economic. Brent Bozell has dedicated his life's work to generating crises where none exist, to distracting from substantive discourse and attacking the reputations of men and women who are trying to effect sensible solutions to meet America's policy needs.]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
